The Los Angeles Design Group (The LADG) is starting a project for a residence in rural Minnesota. The client brief specifies the use of ecologically responsible design and a farmhouse vernacular style. This demand has ginned-up a small crisis in our firm.
Well, two crises actually. First, there is an image crisis. Scanning real estate listings, it is clear that farmhouse is a term loaded with power to differentiate one house from another in a shoppers mind. Farmhouse is different than ranch house is different than rambler. In this informal real estate survey, farmhouse does not seem to be a precise type with organization and formal characteristics. Unlike brick house it does not imply a construction technique and set of possible outcomes specific to its material. Instead, the word is a center of gravity for a cloud of thumbnail images related to each other in the popular imagination. The trouble is working backward toward this image cloud. How do we build a house so that when, years later, its picture is taken, that picture will be captioned farmhouse?
Then there is a substitute crisis. The industry of so-called green building products promotes a logic of substitution where conventional products, like countertops, are swapped out for green products that have sustainable performance values or sustainable inputs, like countertops made out of recycled glass. As in the substitution of soy-based Tofurky for the genuine article, these run the risk of disappointment: disappointment in comparison to the qualities of the original (Tofurky is a listless stand-in for thanksgiving bird) and disappointment at being more of the same (Tofurky is trying to be turkey instead of simply inventing a new thanksgiving food made out of soybeans). At best the outcome is to avoid disappointment.

The Substitute
We are intent on finding ways to sidestep both crises. Both are in a way stuck in a discussion about the value of reproduction ñ reproduction either of a romantic, popular image or reproduction a conventional building component where the original thing, the thing being copied, persists as a reference for the measurement of success. Our engagement with the client brief – both the vernacular and the green is a mandate to operate instead of copy. It means that we will scour technique for opportunities to induce change and generate novelty. A green window that looks exactly like a conventional window is, to us, a missed opportunity to speculate about possible futures motivated by differences in performance values between the two types of window. Similarly, a gabled roof is, to us, an opportunity to speculate about possible futures for design moves that have fallen out of favor in the contemporary avant-garde. To that end, we are assembling a lexicon of terms that we think have the potential to motivate novelty. In each case, the terms have been abstracted somewhat to make them more easily applicable to our work as operations and arguments about material ordering systems instead of images. Weíre hoping this degree of abstraction doesn’t impede readability.
So without further ado, here is the beginning of the lexicon:
Corbel: When a mass is sheared, a response that maintains poise. Corbels emerge in a mass that would otherwise droop, sag, or fail when it encounters a cantilever or span. Force is retransmitted through the corbels along a path that the materiality of the mass can accommodate without failure. They are spongey and porous tissue, not a smooth re-shaping of the mass to a structurally poised, static form, but an additive that visually registers the act of compensation. Corbels preserve material continuity — they are made of the same “stuff” as the mass itself. They are distinct from other responses that accommodate similar structural crises by switching materiality (ie. transitioning from wood steel beams in order to accommodate a cantilever).

Maisons a Colombag

Svedborg Museum
Dormer: A way of making oblique or curved surfaces habitable from the underside. Dormers reinforce difference between volume and surface – they are the place where the requirements of the interior swell beyond the limits of the surface that wraps it. As such they are antagonistic to smoothness and force an accommodating move if continuity is to be maintained. They force a choice between expanding the plastic limits of the roof surface to fold and skin the dormer or allowing volume to be registered as solid, substantial material, independent of the skin that defines its limits. In other words, a choice between a surficial, externally focused architecture and an architecture that can conceive of negative space (the empty, habitable space inside a house) as solid material, thick with its own sets of requirements and performance characteristics. Dormers presume orientation with respect to the body and as such are a little bit about phenomenology whether you like it or not: up is in the direction of standing; habitability is the capacity to traverse the area under a dormer without hitting your head.

German granaries on the Brda rive

Colombier at Manoir d'Ango near Dieppe

Ames Gate Lodge by H. H. Richardson

Granary in Zurich, circa 1897
Straw Bale Wall: A way of thickening the region of exchange between inside and outside in order to slow down transmission of energy. The energy transmitted through this region is both physical and informational. Physically, the conduction of heat through the wall is slowed by high thermal resistivity of cellulose. Heat is slow to move from one side of the wall to another. Straw bale walls also necessitate a theory of the occupantís gaze and the amount of visual information stored in the region between inside and outside. Looking through a cut in a thick wall implies perception of distance, so that the thickness itself becomes a surface populated by information (detailing of frames around doors and windows, for instance). In this sense, the thick region is information-dense and perceptually slow

Strawbale Construction